#Qm fsm error p2 struct driver#
#Qm fsm error p2 struct Patch#
#Qm fsm error p2 struct code#
#Qm fsm error p2 struct mac#

Habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC init/fini calls from common codeĭrivers/misc/habanalabs/common/context.c | 1 +ĭrivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c | 24 +-ĭrivers/misc/habanalabs/common/firmware_if.c | 44 +ĭrivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h | 33 +. Habanalabs/gaudi: Add ethtool support using coresight Habanalabs/gaudi: add WQ control operations Habanalabs/gaudi: add CQ control operations Habanalabs/gaudi: add a new IOCTL for NIC control operations

#Qm fsm error p2 struct mac#

Habanalabs/gaudi: allow user to get MAC addresses in INFO IOCTL Habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC Ethernet support Habanalabs/gaudi: add support for NIC QMANs

Habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC security configuration Habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC firmware-related definitions Habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC H/W and registers definitions

#Qm fsm error p2 struct Patch#

The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch 12).

#Qm fsm error p2 struct code#

This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code To: linux-kernel, netdev +Cc: SW_Drivers, gregkh, davem, kuba, andrew, f.fainelli ` (15 more replies) 0 siblings, 16 replies 83+ messages in thread 17:10 ` habanalabs/gaudi: add NIC firmware-related definitions Oded Gabbay

#Qm fsm error p2 struct driver#

This is not an uncommon requirement.Adding GAUDI NIC code to habanalabs driver LKML Archive on help / color / mirror / Atom feed * Adding GAUDI NIC code to habanalabs driver 17:10 Oded Gabbay It sounds like they have two internal IPs that your company needs to reach and they only want to deal with a single IP from your location. Session Type: LAN-to-LAN, Duration: 0h:00m:00s, Bytes xmt: 0, Bytes rcv: 0, Reason: crypto map policy not foundĪs you can see from here, the IP that UTM 9 is representing is 172.17.0.0 but it should be 10.205.176.24. As confirmation I received this logs from Cisco: My guess is that 1:1 NAT does not work/is not configured properly so that is why phase 2 auth does snot go trough. When taking a look at the logs I see that phase 1 auth goes trough without any problems I defined the Remote GW for this VPN connectionĤ. I defined the policie for the connection and configured the phase 1 and phase 2 auth as received from the other side.Ģ. Now I am trying to set up the VPN to the Cisco ASA 3030 site but with one extra requirement, it needs to go trough the NAT and here is where all stops making sense for me.

I have 5 AWS VPC VPN connection already there and working. I have to say that Cisco is not in our control so we can get logs per request but could take a while.

So as Subject describes I am fighting with IPSEc VPN connection to the Cisco ASA 3030. First I would like to say HI to you all and I am looking forward to be a part of this Community.